The semantic information that is of product next-door neighbor within the the latest lexicon will not, in other words, consist of a specs of intercourse; neighbors is actually vague (or standard, or unspecified) as to the dimensions of intercourse

Polysemy ‘s the preferred label into disease in which good lexical item keeps more than one definition, eg when later can indicate ‘following usual, expected, or assented time’ (I’m late once more), ‘advanced from inside the go out otherwise night’ (a later part of the restaurants), otherwise ‘don’t alive’ (my late cousin Polly). Terminologically speaking, polysemy has to be compared which have homonymy and you may, more importantly, vagueness. When a couple of (or maybe more) words have the same figure, such as lender (‘hill, elevation into the sea otherwise lake bed’) and you will bank (‘monetary institution’), he could be homonyms; while polysemy describes multiplicity out-of definition within one phrase, the latest multiplicity is distributed more various conditions in the case of homonymy. Therefore, and make a positive change between polysemy and homonymy relates to determining if or not we’re speaking about you to and exact same keyword or with a couple of different ones. The new difference in vagueness and polysemy requires the case of whether or not a particular piece of semantic information is a portion of the root semantic design of one’s product or perhaps is the consequence of an effective contextual (thus pragmatic) requirements. As an example, neighbors is not polysemous amongst the indication ‘men dweller next door’ and you will ‘lady dweller across the street,’ in the sense your utterance my neighbors try a good civil slave will never be recognized as requiring disambiguation throughout the method in which she’s smart you will (Do you indicate ‘bright’ otherwise ‘stylish’?).

To choose ranging from polysemy and you may vagueness, a lot of assessment is invoked. The 3 fundamental of them will be the pursuing the. Very first, from a fact-theoretic point of view, an effective lexical goods was polysemous whether or not it can on the other hand become demonstrably real and you can certainly false of the same referent. Considering the readings ‘harbor’ and you may ‘strengthened nice wines off Portugal’ off port, the latest polysemy of the goods is made because of the sentences such as Sandeman are an interface (inside a container), however an interface (having ships). It expectations fundamentally grabs good semantic instinct: are a couple of interpretations regarding confirmed expression naturally well enough dissimilar very as possible be said to incorporate and the most other maybe not?

Particularly, he’s based on acceptability judgments about phrases containing a few related situations of one’s product at issue (among and therefore matical relationship anywhere between both events need their semantic title, new ensuing sentence can be an indication to the polysemy of the thing

2nd, linguistic screening involve syntactic in the place of semantic intuitions. For example, the latest thus-titled title test comes to ‘identity-of-sense anaphora.’ For this reason, at nighttime the newest ship passed the latest port, and therefore performed the brand new bartender is awkward if for example the several lexical significance of port is located at stake. Disregarding puns, it can merely mean that the vessel plus the bartender similar enacted the fresh new harbor, otherwise on the other hand one to both gone a certain version of drink off you to definitely location to some other. A mixed reading, where first occurrence out of vent is the harbor and 2nd so you’re able to drink, often is omitted. By contrast, that the fresh notions ‘vintage sweet wines out-of Portugal’ and ‘mixed nice wine out of Portugal’ are mutual in the Vintage Noval try a port, and therefore are blended Sandeman reveals that port is actually vague instead than just polysemous pertaining to the fresh new difference between mixed and antique wines.

Third, the brand new definitional criterion specifies that a product provides one or more lexical meaning if you have zero minimally specific definition covering the extension of one’s item overall, and this has no significantly more lexical meanings than there are maximally general definitions needed seriously to define their expansion. Significance away from lexical items is maximally standard in the same manner that they will be shelter as the large good subset of one’s extension regarding something as you are able to. Hence, separate meanings having ‘combined sweet strengthened wine regarding Portugal’ and you will ‘vintage nice strengthened drink from Portugal’ could not meet the requirements definitions from lexical definitions, because they can be delivered together with her according to the definition ‘sweet strengthened wine out-of Portugal.’ As well, definitions will likely be minimally particular in the same way which they is to be adequate to distinguish the item off their nonsynonymous issues. A maximally standard definition level one another vent ‘harbor’ and you can port ‘form of wine’ within the meaning ‘procedure, entity’ datingranking.net/cs/passion-recenze was excluded whilst cannot simply take brand new specificity out-of port just like the unlike almost every other terms.